Re: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?

[Oyvind Teig <Oyvind.Teig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

  Adrian wrote:
> What is wrong with David (May) and Henk's approach? The language 
> I have played with has ports rather than channels to cope with that. 

  I didn't realize this! (a frog only sees a fly when it moves in
  front of its eyes - (true!)). Could you please elaborate? Oh, one 
  thing, when can I have it?

  Marcel wrote:
> I get the impression that your approach is wrong in the first
> place... no offence...  or... I guess you are trying to do
> dynamic stuff, whereas Occam isn't dynamic...

  As I have "proved" earlier: occam is more "dynamic" than some people
  here like to believe. And no, of course my approach is not wrong:
  it's basic Darwinism:-] I live by this, and have to reuse things!
  And the old functionality isn't always 100% what I want now,
  but I do want the _same_ source files (although modified, with
  side-effects into old user, probably bad, but yes, I live by it!)
  (I know, Darwinism is debatable!)

-- 
Oyvind

@ Oyvind Teig (oyvind.teig@xxxxxxxxxxxx, oyvind.teig@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
@   Navia Maritime AS, division Autronica, 7005 Trondheim Norway 
@   Tel: +47 73 58 12 68, Fax: +47 73 58 10 01
@   http://www.autronica.no/ 
@   Now part of world's largest company in maritime electronics: 
@   http://www.kongsberg.com/
@ Publications at: http://www.autronica.no/pub/tech/rd/index.htm