Re: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?

[M_Boosten <mboosten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Oyvind wrote:
>   Marcel wrote:
> > I get the impression that your approach is wrong in the first
> > place... no offence...  or... I guess you are trying to do
> > dynamic stuff, whereas Occam isn't dynamic...
> 
>   As I have "proved" earlier: occam is more "dynamic" than some people
>   here like to believe. And no, of course my approach is not wrong:
>   it's basic Darwinism:-] I live by this, and have to reuse things!
>   And the old functionality isn't always 100% what I want now,
>   but I do want the _same_ source files (although modified, with
>   side-effects into old user, probably bad, but yes, I live by it!)
>   (I know, Darwinism is debatable!)

Sure, us "industrialists" have to live with what we have got...
:-)

Or: make a revolutionary change into a direction that is proven to
    be A LOT better, and have a lot of money.

Cheers,
	Marcel